Are you a conspiracy theorist? If not, perhaps you should be. Yes, there have certainly been a lot of “conspiracy theories” over the years that have turned out not to be accurate. However, the truth is that a large number of very prominent conspiracy theories have turned out to actually be true. 16 Conspiracy Theories That Turned Out To Be TrueSo the next time that you run into some “tin foil hat wearing lunatics”, you might want to actually listen to what they have to say. They may actually know some things that you do not. In fact, one recent study found that “conspiracy theorists” are actually more sane than the general population. So the next time you are tempted to dismiss someone as a “conspiracy theorist”, just remember that the one that is crazy might actually be you. The following are 16 popular conspiracy theories that turned out to be true…

SMi release attendee list for Military Robotics 2014

SMi's 2nd annual conference on Military Robotics takes place next week on the 21st and 22nd May 2014 in London, UK.  Network with the following confirmed attendees:

To best understand this problem, insert the words "government, the New World Order/global elite front organization" in front of the 'United States' in the questions below....Like this:  The "United States (government, the New World Order / criminal global elite front-organization) " or  shadow govt.

Post by A.P. Thomas

(Thomas Dishaw)  Decorated CIA veteran Robert Tosh Plumlee is under fire from The Justice Department for his recent  list of 11 questions the main stream media will not answer. According to Plumlee he will be served with a subpoena ultimately silencing himself or face legal prosecution. Below are the questions the Government doesn’t want you to read.   More to come on this story as it develops….

Questions that most of the Main Stream Media will NOT, or Not allowed to ask during their so called Press meetings with the Administration. Some may consider these eleven questions chilling, or conspiratorial in nature. However, I feel they are valid questions and we the American people deserve simple answers to the following simple questions:

1. Is the United States (government, the New World Order / criminal global elite front-organization) secretly arming and supporting various factions of the Syrian Rebels with high caliber impact weapons from The United States arsenals?

2. Is the United States (government, the New World Order / criminal global elite front-organization) little known Direct Commercial Sales Program, also known as ʻThe Blue Lantern Report”, being used as a ʻcutoutʼ to secretly aid both sides of a Middle Eastern civil war?

3. Is America (government, the New World Order / criminal global elite front-organization) again playing both sides against the middle for corporate gain as previously demonstrated by the Cuban Project of the fifties and sixties, as well as the Iran Contra fiasco of the eighties and the South American—Mexican Drug Wars of the nineties?

It has been established via some field reports from the Middle East and some isolated media reports that the Direct Commercial Sales Program (DCSP) an American international program, which legally allows the United States (government, the New World Order / criminal global elite front-organization) to sell weapons to a host of foreign countries without monitoring those weapons after leaving our arsenals, stockpiles, and jurisdiction, has shipped High Impact weapons to Syrian Rebels during the last two years.

4. What happens to those weapons after legally being sold via this program and they leave our control?

5. Are they being monitored, traced, certified, and inventoried after arriving in other countries?

6. Will our troops one day again face these American made (government, the New World Order / criminal global elite front-organization) weapons on some foreign battlefield?

7. Is this Direct Commercial Sales program a secret cash cow for many US (the New World Order / criminal global elite front-organization) Corporations, international arms merchants, its insiders, or affiliates?

8. Is it possible this could be another ʻoff-the-booksʼ secret covert operation ran by the CIAʼs Special Tactical Unit, (the New World Order / criminal global elite front-organization) similar to the Iran-Contra operations of the eighties?

9. Could we be selling and supplying dangerous high impact weapons, while aiding and financing both sides of a Civil War in Syria?

10.Could we (the occupied government, the New World Order / criminal global elite front-organization) be escalating the Middle East conflict either knowingly, perhaps unintentionally by providing weapons to both sides of the Syrian conflict?

11. Did the ambassador and others, weeks before they were murdered, notify our State Department and CIA that Syrian rebels had obtained US (government, the New World Order / criminal global elite front-organization) weapons including “Stinger Missiles” from Jordan, Turkey and Pakistan shipped from CIA safe houses?

These are simple questions.

What's Next?  Business as usual, persecution and PROSECUTION for asking questions in Amerika (America if you like the former spelling and the allusion of freedom, the three cheers for the red, white and blue)...the citizens self reporting meaningless crap on the govt front company facebook - meaningless crap, hours of mindless, mind control TV viewing, until the noose tightened around us all, that all...I am not goint to even get into how the govt knew, I just told you.  No rebellion to the NO privacy, full blown tyranny awaits.

Don't forget the mental propaganda training of Federal and Local Enforcement, telling them that returning vets, constitutionalists and gun owners are domestic terrorists. DHS / Local Police:

Drones, etc, etc.

by A.P. Thomas

"U.S. lags behind other countries in commercial use of drones"

Py op in the Headlines (from the globalist/corporate/govt/CIA media)...did you catch if when you read it?...IT GOES ON THROUGH OUT THE ARTICLE - PY OP.

The article goes on...



As the United States continues to explore regulations and safety guidelines for commercial UAVs, other countries have already adopted their use. Photographers, real estate agents, filmmakers, and news agencies in the United States want to use drones in their operations, but the FAA insists that rules addressing safety challenges associated with drones need to be in place before drones can share the sky with manned air crafts. [NOTICE PRIVACY ISN'T MENTIONED. ONLY KEEPING UP WITH THE JONES & SAFETY...WHAT ABOUT PRIVACY?]

Read more

As the United States continues to explore regulations and safety guidelines for commercial UAVs, other countries have already adopted their use.

• For twenty years, Yamaha Motor Company has been offering its RMAX helicopter drones to Japanese farmers and agribusinesses for spraying crops. The radio-controlled drones typically weigh less than 140 pounds, are cheaper than deploying a plane, and are more accurate in applying fertilizers and pesticides.
• Zookal, a Sydney-based company, plans to deliver books to college students via drones later this year.
• The United Arab Emirates (UAE) is testing the delivery of government documents like driver’s licenses and permits using small drones.
• Energy companies in the United Kingdom are using drones to check the undersides of oil platforms for corrosion and repairs.

ABC News reports that in the United States, however, when Lakemaid Beer tried to use a drone to deliver six-packs to ice fishermen on a frozen lake in Minnesota, the FAA grounded the drones.

Photographers, real estate agents, filmmakers, and news agencies in the United States want to use drones in their operations, but the FAA insists that rules addressing safety challenges associated with drones need to be in place before drones can share the sky with manned aircrafts.

ABC News notes that the FAA has worked on regulations for the past decade and may still be years away from issuing final rules for small drones; rules for larger drones, those weighing more than fifty-five pounds, will take longer to compile.

“We don’t have the luxury of waiting another 20 years,” said Paul McDuffee, vice president of drone-maker Insitu, a subsidiary of Boeing. “This industry is exploding. It’s getting to the point where it may end up happening with or without the FAA’s blessing.”

Earlier this month, a federal judge dismissed the only fine the FAA has imposed on a commercial drone operator, saying that the agency cannot enforce regulations that do not exist. The FAA has appealed the ruling, claiming it controls access to the national air space.

Jim Williams, head of the FAA’s drone unit, said setting rules for the United States is more complex than other nations since the United States has more air traffic and a wider variety of aircrafts. “It’s a different culture in the U.S. and Canada,” Williams told ABC News. “People believe they have the right to just jump in their airplane and fly just like they do their car. … We can’t set up a system that puts any of those folks at risk.”

According to the Teal Group, an aerospace research company, worldwide sales of civilian and military drones will reach an estimated $89 billion over the next decade. The FAA estimates roughly 7,500 small commercial drones will be active in the United States within five years after FAA regulations are in place.

The FAA does permit hobbyists to fly model aircrafts, but voluntary guidelines for hobbyists include staying away from airports, flying at an altitude of less than 400 feet, and the operator must maintain line of sight with the aircraft.

“You could go off to the hobby shop, buy a little remote control helicopter and fly it to your heart’s content,” McDuffee said. “But if you hung a digital camera on that, took pictures of your neighbor’s roof and sold those pictures to him or her, now you are in business and you’re flying” an unmanned aircraft system.